37 organisations denounce ongoing harassment against KISA and call on Cypriot authorities to reinstate its official registration as a non-governmental organisation (NGO)
On 3 March, KISA, a leading non-governmental organisation fighting for equality in Cyprus, will have a hearing that has implications for their very survival.
In December 2020, the Cypriot Minister of Interior abruptly removed KISA, and many other civil society organisations, from the Register of Associations. He did so using his new, self-attributed powers1 to start a dissolution process for NGOs if certain regulatory requirements were not met within a two-month notice period. In KISA’s case, they informed the authorities of a delay in organising their general assembly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite KISA indicating that all formal requirements would be met within a short time period, and appealing against the Minister’s decision, they were nonetheless deleted from the Register of Associations.
This is just the latest move in a long campaign to discredit and silence independent voices in Cyprus, in particular KISA, and ultimately attack the foundations of democratic pluralism. The trend of shrinking civic space seems to be dangerously spreading all across the region. For example, in November 2019, Greece proposed worrying amendments to the Greek legislation on NGO registration engaged in activities related to asylum, migration, and social inclusion. On 27 December 2020, the Turkish Parliament approved legislation further restricting NGOs and civil society activities under the guise of countering terrorism.
On 3 March 2021, the Cypriot administrative court will review KISA’s appeal against the decision to remove the organisation from the Register of Associations, through an expedited procedure. If the removal of KISA from the register is confirmed and the procedure for dissolution completed, people in extreme situations of vulnerability will stop receiving crucial help , and Cypriot democracy will lose one of its leading independent voices.
KISA has in the meantime submitted to the Registrar of Associations all formal requirements of the Law, namely its audited accounts for 2019, the amended statutes and the names of the new Steering Committee, with their positions and contact details.
As KISA is fighting this decision before the national courts, civil society organisations from across Europe have raised their voices in solidarity. This is not the first attempt to silence the organisation: over its 22 years of existence, KISA has been the target2 of defamation campaigns, intimidation, and even criminal prosecutions against its Executive Director, Doros Polykarpou.3
In order to promote a conducive environment for independent civil society and solidarity with migrants and refugees and remove restrictions to civil society’s space, the undersigned organisations call upon the following authorities to:
The Cypriot government and President of the Parliament to:
- Re-insert KISA in the Register of Associations;
- Put an end to the ongoing judicial harassment against KISA and its members.
- Repeal the Amendment 118 (I)/2020 of the 2017 Law on Associations and Foundations and Other Related Issues, which grants the Ministry of Interior of Cyprus executive powers to remove NGOs from the Register of Associations and prohibits un-registered NGOs from continuing their actions;
- Comply with international standards on the right to freedom of association and the protection of human rights defenders, and in particular the joint OSCE/ODIHR and Venice Commission Guidelines on Freedom of Association, the OSCE Guidelines on the Protection of Human Rights Defenders , the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders and the recommendations of the Council of Europe NGO Expert Group4.
The European Union to:
- Condemn the ongoing judicial harassment against KISA;
- Call on the Cypriot authorities to respect and uphold the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights, the rule of law principles, and the right to freedom of association;
- Monitor early signs of harrassment of individuals and organisations working with migrants, before it escalates into the criminalisation of human rights defenders and civil society organisations.
Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS)
European Civic Forum
European Network Against Racism
FIDH – International Federation for Human Rights, in the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
Front Line Defenders
Institute of Race Relations
International Service for Human Rights (ISHR)
La Strada International
Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM)
World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), in the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
All Included (Netherlands)
AMERA International (UK)
Asociación Rumiñahui (Spain)
Association for Integration and Migration (Czech Republic)
Ban Ying e.V (Germany)
Centre for Peace Studies (Croatia)
Centre for Youths Integrated Development (UK)
CLA Voice (Bulgaria)
FAIRWORK Belgium (Belgium)
FairWork (the Netherlands)
Federación SOS Racismo (Spain)
Greek Council for Refugees (Greece)
Human Rights League (Slovakia)
İnsan Hakları Derneği / Human Rights Association (Turkey)
INTEGRIM LAB (Belgium)
Maisha e.v. – African women (Germany)
Migrant Rights Centre Ireland
Mujeres supervivientes de violencias de género (Spain)
Network for Children’s Rights (Greece)
Progress Lawyers Network (Belgium)
SNAPAP CGATA Algerie (Algeria)
Tamkeen for legal aid and human rights (Jordan)
The Hotline for Refugees and Migrants (Israel)
1 Amendment 118 (I)/2020 of the 2017 Law on Associations and Foundations and Other Related Issues
4 Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)14 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the legal status of non-governmental organisations in Europe; Guidelines on Protecting NGO work in Support of refugees and other migrants; Recommendation CM/Rec(2018)11 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the need to strengthen the protection and promotion of civil society space in Europe; Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation 2086 (2016) ““How can inappropriate restrictions on NGO activities in Europe be prevented?”