China: Torture of human rights defender Liu Jie while undergoing re-education through labour

Front Line is deeply concerned following reports that human rights defender Liu Jie has been tortured during her re-education through labour (RTL). Liu Jie is a defender of human rights in rural communities who has campaigned for political and legal reforms in China.
Further Information
Posted 17 June 2008 On 22 May 2008, Liu Jie was transferred from Qiqihar RTL camp to Harbin Drug Rehabilitation Centre where she has reportedly been tortured. The form of torture performed on Liu Jie is known as the “Tiger Bench”. She has been forced to sit upright on a long bench with her hands tied behind her back, her thighs tied to the bench, and her feet raised off the floor by bricks under her feet. This exerts extreme strain on her knees and causes great pain. Liu Jie was allegedly subjected to this form of torture for 5 consecutive days.
Liu Jie was transferred to the rehabilitation centre after protesting about the conditions under which she and other detainees were kept in Qiqihar RTL camp. There they are said to have worked for fourteen hours per day to make crafts with poisonous chemical dye which stained their hands. Torture in the rehabilitation centre was allegedly carried out to instill discipline in new detainees. On 12 November 2007, Liu Jie was originally sent to the RTL camp for “instigating trouble” and “disturbing social order” after having organised a public letter signed by 12,150 petitioners in favour of political and legal reforms in China.
Front Line believes that Liu Jie has been targeted as a result of her legitimate work in the defence of human rights, in particular her work to defend the rights of rural communities in China. Front Line is concerned for the physical and psychological integrity of Liu Jie.
This Urgent Appeal has now ended. No further action is requested at this point. Thank you for taking action on this case.
Front Line issues Urgent Appeals on behalf of human rights defenders at risk on a daily basis. These Appeals normally remain active on our web site for a period of up to six weeks, depending on the situation. After this time they will be archived. Front Line maintains a watching brief on all these cases but no further action is requested after the six weeks, unless there is a significant development in the case.